On one hand It is claimed that there is no compulsion in the religion of Islam but when ever a muslim becomes an apostate the clerics start demanding death penalty for that person.Is it not a glaring contradiction?
It is generally believed that apostasy is punishable by death. This prevailing concept about apostasy, we believe, has arisen by not understanding a hadith. This hadith has been narrated by Ibn-i-Abbaas in the following way:
“Execute the person who changes his faith.” (Bukhari: Kitab Istatabatul-Murtaddeen)
Our jurists regard this verdict to have a general application for all times upon every Muslim who renounces his faith. In their opinion, this hadith warrants punishment by death for every Muslim who becomes a disbeliever. In this matter, the only point in which there is a disagreement among the jurists is whether an apostate should be granted time for repentance, and if so what should be the extent of this period. The Hanafite jurists though, exempt women from this punishment. Apart from them, there is a general concensus among the jurists that very apostate, man or woman, should punished by death.
This opinion of our jurists is not correct. The verdict pronounced in this tradition does not have a general application but is only confined to the people towards whom the Prophet (sws) had been directly assigned. The Quran uses the words mushrikeen and ummiyyeen for these people. An elaboration of this view follows.
In this world, we are well aware of the fact that life has been endowed to us not because it is our right but because it is a trial and a test for us. Death puts an end to it whenever the period of this test is over, as deemed by the Almighty. In ordinary circumstances, He fixes the length of this period on the basis of His knowledge and wisdom. In special circumstances, when a Messenger(Rasul) is assigned towards a nation, the span is governed by another Divine law associated solely with the Rasul and his companions.This divine law has been explained in the Quran in detail in many places.It is based upon certain premises which must be understood beforehand: A Messenger(Rasul)is the final authority on this earth about matters which pertain to faith. No other person can illustrate and explicate the essentials of faith in a better manner. He uses his extraordinary powers of intellect and reasoning to deliver and disseminate the truth revealed to him. He explains the truth in its ultimate form after which a person can have no excuse but stubborness and arrogance to deny it. It has been indicated before that God’s purpose in endowing life to people is to test whether they accept and uphold the truth when it comes to them. In these special circumstances, the truth is unveiled to them in its purest form by no other a personality than the messenger of God. If they then deny it, there is no possibility whatsoever that a further extension in life can induce them to accept it. It is at this juncture that the Divine law sanctions the death sentence for them.
The sentence is enforced upon them in one of the two ways depending upon the situation which arises. In the first case, after itmam i hujjat (ie unveiling the truth to the extent that no one has an excuse to deny it), a Messenger and his companions not being able to achieve political ascendancy in some other territory migrate from their people. In this case, Divine punishment descends upon them in the form of raging storms, cyclones and other calamities which completely destroy them. Historically speaking, the tribes of Aad and Thamud and the people of Noah and Lot besides many other nations met with this dreadful fate, as has been mentioned in the Quran. In the second case, a Messenger and his companions are able to acquire political ascendancy in a land where after performing Itmaam-i-Hujjat upon their people they migrate. In this case, a Messenger subdues his nation by force, and executes them if they do not accept faith. It was this situation which had arisen in the case of the Prophet (sws). On account of this, the Almighty bade him to declare that the people among the ummiyyeen who will not accept faith until the day of Hajj-i-Akbar (9th Hijra) will be given a final extension by a proclamation made in the field of Arafaat on that day. According to the proclamation, this final extension would end with the last day of the month of Muharram, during which they must accept faith, or face execution at the end of this period. The Quran says:
“When the forbidden months are over, slay the idolators wherever you find them. Seize them, surround them and every where lie in ambush for them. But if they repent and establish regular prayers and pay zakat, then spare their lives. God is oft-forgiving and ever merciful.” [9:5]
A hadith illustrates this law in the following manner:
“I have been ordained to fight against these people until they testify to the oneness of God and assent to my prophethood, establish regular prayers and pay zakat. If they accept these terms, their lives will be spared except if they commit some other violation that demands their execution by Islamic law.” (Bukhari: Kitab-ul-Imaan)
This law, as has been stated before, is specifically meant for the ummiyyeen or the people towards whom the Prophet Muhammad(sws) had been directly assigned. Apart from them, it has no bearing upon any other person or nation. So much so, that even the people of the Book who were present in the Prophet’s times were exempted from this law by the Quran. Consequently, where the death penalty for the ummiyyeen has been mentioned in the Quran, adjacent to it has also been stated in unequivocal terms that the people of the Book shall be spared and granted citizenship if they pay Jizya. The Quran says:
“Fight against those among the people of the Book who believe not in God nor in the Last Day, and who do not forbid what God and His Prophet have forbidden and do not accept the religion of truth as their own religion, until they pay Jizya out of subjugation and lead a life of submission.” [9:29]
There is a natural corollory to this Divine law as obvious as the law itself. As stated above, the death penalty had been imposed upon the ummiyyeen if they did not accept faith after a certain period. Hence, it follows that if a person among the ummiyyeen after accepting faith reverts to his original state of disbelief, he must face the same penalty. Indeed, it is this reversion about which the Prophet (sws) has said `Execute the person who changes his faith.
The relative pronoun `who’ in this hadith qualifies the ummiyyeen just as the words `the people’ (An-naas) in the hadith quoted earlier are specifically meant for the ummiyyeen. When the basis of this law as narrated in these Aahadith exists in the Quran with a certain specification, then quite naturally this specification should also be sustained in the corollory of the law. Our jurists have committed the cardinal mistake of not relating the relative pronoun `who’ with its basis in the Quran as has been done in the case of `the people’ (An-naas). Instead of interpreting the tradition in the light of the relationship between the Quran and Sunnah, they have interpreted it in the absolute sense, totally against the context of the Quran. Consequently, in their opinion the verdict pronounced in the tradition has a general and an unconditional application. They have thereby incorporated in the Islamic Penal Code a punishment that has no basis in the Shariah.
There is no doubt whatsoever that this death penalty was prescribed only for the ummiyyeen who lived during the Prophethood of Mohammad (sws),so,if a Muslim becomes an apostate and is also not a source of nuisance for an Islamic State, he cannot be given any punishment merely on the basis of apostasy.